<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Smart on tsvinc</title>
		<link>https://tsvinc.dev/tags/smart/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Smart on tsvinc</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://tsvinc.dev/tags/smart/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>Designing alerts you&#39;ll actually understand at 3am</title>
				<link>https://tsvinc.dev/posts/alerts-you-understand-at-3am/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://tsvinc.dev/posts/alerts-you-understand-at-3am/</guid>
				<description>&lt;div class=&#34;tldr&#34;&gt;&#xA;  &lt;span class=&#34;tldr-label&#34;&gt;TL;DR&lt;/span&gt;&#xA;  A digest that dumps raw SMART counters is complete and useless: &lt;code&gt;re=344&lt;/code&gt; means nothing at 3am. Alert on &lt;em&gt;growth&lt;/em&gt; — compare today&#39;s counters against yesterday&#39;s row for the same serial, and push urgently only when a number moved. Seed the first sighting of a drive silently, or every new disk pages you on day one. Two channels, two intents: a calm daily digest that reassures, and an urgent push that interrupts.&#xA;&lt;/div&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Here is the notification my daily SMART logger pushed on day one. Four drives, one line each, everything the tool knew:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Reallocated sectors: is your drive dying or just scarred?</title>
				<link>https://tsvinc.dev/posts/reallocated-sectors-dying-or-scarred/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://tsvinc.dev/posts/reallocated-sectors-dying-or-scarred/</guid>
				<description>&lt;div class=&#34;tldr&#34;&gt;&#xA;  &lt;span class=&#34;tldr-label&#34;&gt;TL;DR&lt;/span&gt;&#xA;  A high &lt;code&gt;Reallocated_Sector_Ct&lt;/code&gt; is history, not prognosis. The drive with 344 reallocations was healthy — scarred, but its firmware was still successfully remapping. The drive with &lt;em&gt;zero&lt;/em&gt; reallocations was the dying one: &lt;code&gt;Current_Pending_Sector&lt;/code&gt; climbing while the reallocated count stayed pinned at 0 means the firmware has stopped remapping, which is the failure. Judge by whether the counters &lt;em&gt;move&lt;/em&gt; under a forced write pass, not by the raw number.&#xA;&lt;/div&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Two drives on the same HBA, same evening, same test. Here are the SMART lines that matter, before I touched either of them:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
