<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Licensing on tsvinc</title>
		<link>https://tsvinc.dev/tags/licensing/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Licensing on tsvinc</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://tsvinc.dev/tags/licensing/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>Your GraalVM Version Is the Other Number</title>
				<link>https://tsvinc.dev/posts/graalvm-editions-2026/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://tsvinc.dev/posts/graalvm-editions-2026/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;This was going to be a buyer&#39;s guide: which GraalVM to build native images with in 2026, what the free edition lacks, and what Oracle&#39;s licence allows. It starts with a version check, because the to-do list for my benchmark&#39;s native builds opened with an upgrade. The builder was on GraalVM CE 25.0.4.1, the list said, a few releases behind the current line.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The build log has an opinion on that:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
